Salem's Lot Paperback | Pages: 483 pages

Mention Containing Books Salem's Lot

Title	:	Salem's Lot
Author	:	Stephen King
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	17th Impression
Pages	:	Pages: 483 pages
Published	:	1991 by New English Library (first published October 17th 1975)
Categories	:	Thriller. Fiction. Mystery. Crime. Suspense. Action. Mystery Thriller

Explanation Concering Books Salem's Lot

so i DID like this, and i don’t really have anything cool or fun to say about it for a review. but i just realized that i forgot to mention the boob euphemism of choice for this book was JAHOOBIES. i just wanted you all to know that....ok bye

Present Books In Pursuance Of Salem's Lot

Original Title:	'Salem's Lot
ISBN:	0450031063 (ISBN13: 9780450031069)
Edition Language:	English
Characters:	Benjamin Mears, Susan Norton, Matt Burke, Mark Petrie, Father Donald Callahan, Mike Ryerson, Dr James Cody, Richard Throckett Straker, Danny Glick, Larry Crockett, Sonny James, Charles Boone, Loretta Starcher, Weasel Craig, Larry McLeod, Joe Crane, June Petrie, Hal Griffen, Dud Rogers, Cynthia Stowens, Buddy Bascomb, Nolly Gardener, Tookey, Miss Coogan, Royal Snow, Harriet Durham
Setting:	Jerusalem's Lot, Maine(United States)
Literary Awards:	World Fantasy Award Nominee for Best Novel (1976)

Rating Containing Books Salem's Lot

Ratings: 4.02 From 312563 Users | 9217 Reviews

Write Up Containing Books Salem's Lot

1.24.19-I just finished my third read of SALEM'S LOT, this time via audiobook. The narrator, Ron McClarty worked well for me and I found this tale as satisfying as it ever was. 11.1.2014-Original review. I just finished a re-read of this book with the Horror Aficionados group here at Goodreads. I'm so glad that I participated!Remember little Danny Glick? I first read this book in junior high or high school. It's been about 30 years since then, unfortunately. I've read The Stand and IT a couple

Vampires are my personal bogeymanI remember seeing "Salem's Lot" the movie, with David Soul as Ben Mears, when I was fifteen years old, and I truly believed in the existence of vampires for at least a week after watching that movie. (...and maybe, I never stopped believing...)Sometime in my early twenties, I picked up a copy of Salem's Lot and read it for the first time. So it's been a while, close to thirty years between reads.Some people may say that this book begins as a slow burn, but I

Upon learning that a remake of 'Salem's Lot is in the works I finally decided to pick this one up and see if it could help me climb out of the reading slump hole I have been in for over a month. This review contains two parts, the first part is where I fantasy cast the upcoming movie and the second is a review of the book. "Conjuring" director James Wan is producing the big screen adaptation and the script is being written by Gary Dauberman, who is also an executive producer on the project.

Brilliant! Just Brilliant!I wasn't even born in 1975 when the book was published, yet i connected with the story and the characters. They didn't seem old fashioned and out-dated. Stephen King sure knows how to captivate the reader and scare the shit out of them in his typical way. Aptly, we had a couple of nights of thunderstorms here and suffice it to say i had to check the windows to make sure they were closed properly.

Well this is annoying times two. I just wrote a review and lost it, and then there's the *other* issue.What other issue?Oh, the one where my 14 year old self of infinite wisdom and experience remembered a boring tale lacking truly epic blood and guts from what should be a vampire tale in a small town. If that 14 year old could have had his way, then 80% of the novel would have been excised for being too-character driven, too-focused on hundreds of characters only set up to be knocked down in

Hey. Im not a vampire fan, okay?I mean, I am cool with scary books, and I read scary books, but vampires...Theyre just not really my thing. If I had to power rank my favorite types of horror novels, and I cant imagine a time where I would have to do that, except now, obviously...Vampires would be near the bottom of the list. Vampires would be one or two spots above werewolves. Werewolves are stupid, and so are books about them. Werewolves, give me a break. Now, I am a Stephen King fan. Not all

A novel about a creepy town and deadly vampires. This should've received 5 stars from me, but I was a bit disappointed with this novel.I swear I wanted to love this novel, but it was an okay read for me. An okay read from the King. I'm 100% sure that something is wrong with me, and not the novel.My main problem with the novel would be the fact that it took almost 350 pages for it to become really interesting. The character and plot introduction felt 150 pages longer than it should've been. Aside